Substantial medical evidence is a term used in workers’ compensation to describe whether a doctor’s report contains the necessary requirements for the report to be regarded as credible evidence. The criteria to determine whether a report constitutes substantial medical evidence are as follows:
When looking at a doctor’s opinion after an examination takes place, it is important to ensure that the doctor has been provided with the correct facts. Sometimes a doctor will base his/her opinions on incorrect or misinterpreted information. Sometimes, the injured worker may provide the doctor with the incorrect facts or be unable to recall certain facts correctly during an examination.
It is always important to determine if the doctor relied upon the appropriate facts and supported the reasoning for his conclusions. If not, the doctor’s report can be challenged at the time of settlement or Trial and may be disregarded as evidence for settlement purposes.
If a report is found not to be substantial evidence, the parties may need to secure additional reporting from that doctor or alternatively go through the entire process again with another medical examiner.
If you have questions about your workers' compensation injury and want to talk to an attorney in Fresno, please call 559-408-7436 or fill out the form to the right.
The materials available at this web site are for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should contact an attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. Use of and access to this Web site or any of the e-mail links contained within the site do not create an attorney-client relationship between the Law Offices of Jeremy K. Lusk, Inc. and the reader.